/b/ - Random

Anything posted here are autistic works of fiction, only a fool would take them seriously.

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

(244.71 KB 1500x574 chingchong.png)
8kun now hosted on Chinese servers Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 08:16:27 [Preview] No. 24262 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Better not mention Tiananmen Square if it comes back online!

Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 08:17:16 [Preview] No.24263 del
An open letter to Alibaba and Tencent, regarding 8kun's use of their cloud computing infrastructure 致阿里巴巴和腾讯的公开信,内容涉及8kun使用其云计算基础架构
The letter is in both English and Chinese. (Human translated.) 该信有中英文两种。(人类翻译。)

Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 07:47:29 [Preview] No. 24259 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I've already located Space_, and I've dispatched high-altitude drones over the Californian area for odilitime.

Expect Us.

Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 08:10:46 [Preview] No.24260 del
(369.25 KB 507x676 spacedies.png)

(54.95 KB 800x800 ME-2294.png)
Scenario Thread Anonymous 10/18/2019 (Fri) 05:29:00 [Preview] No. 24258 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>Propose a question, and answer those before yours.

You won a scratcher! $10,000 burger dollars have been given to you in cash for your own spending! With this money you have the power to do many things, such as buying a vehicle, renting an apartment, or just upgrading your computer. What is it that you would do with this money?

My Answer
Get myself a nice older diesel truck that I can use for desert exploration, buy a used paraglider, and invest the rest. Paraglider for moving around extremely quickly and efficiently, and the invested money for returns.

(2.47 KB 400x400 hai.gif)
Anonymous 10/05/2019 (Sat) 09:35:59 [Preview] No. 23815 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
hey guys!
43 posts and 23 images omitted.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 00:13:05 [Preview] No.24247 del
I have been watching this thread for a week and a half, and I can honestly say I am on the edge of my seat.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 18:14:57 [Preview] No.24254 del
Well at least you had your helmet on

Me too. I wonder how the story's going to end

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 21:21:32 [Preview] No.24255 del
(15.76 KB 400x400 swing.gif)

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 21:22:31 [Preview] No.24256 del
(6.19 KB 400x400 fly.gif)

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 21:22:57 [Preview] No.24257 del
(4.39 KB 400x400 flip.gif)

(20.71 KB 800x480 bugbombsarei[1].jpg)
Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 01:55:50 [Preview] No. 24220 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I had to go the ER today to have one of these removed from my ear. How many people will ever know or understand the sheer terror of being able to painfully feel an insect wriggling around inside of them?

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 07:43:26 [Preview] No.24227 del
1. The human body is more bacteria than human.
2. Don't look up bot fly videos.

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 14:44:24 [Preview] No.24232 del
How did you even get that inside your ear?

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 16:30:06 [Preview] No.24233 del
I went to sleep in my infested apartment. I was laying on my side in a way that exposed my ear or pulled it back to widen its opening.
Then I woke up to horrible pain coming from my ear. I could feel it moving around in there. Each of its legs displacing my ear wax and clawing against my ear drum trying to break through.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 18:13:27 [Preview] No.24253 del
(57.65 KB 382x358 1496997872000.jpg)
Well that sucks. I heard a story online that was similar to yours. A woman was visiting South America and slept in an infested apartment just like you and ended up getting maggots crawling inside her brain afterwards.

She found out months later when she was bleeding from her ear. Sick stuff bro. Such little creatures, so much damage

(84.90 KB 295x171 sans-titre.png)
(15.99 KB 307x164 imagesYWBQP7NK.jpg)
funny little games Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 14:39:48 [Preview] No. 24252 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

The (sexual) Ring of Gyges - if you could, would you? Anonymous 10/10/2019 (Thu) 19:54:14 [Preview] No. 24055 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Imagine that there are is no age of consent or adulthood, that there are no laws concerning incest, bestiality, necrophilia, cannibalism, or vampirism, no laws concerning miscegenation, bisexuality, or homosexuality, no laws preventing you from having multiple partners in marriage, no laws concerning bodily exposure in public, or concerning having sex in public, and no laws concerning prostitution or pornography.
BDSM is legally unrestricted as well, and It's even completely legal to torture and kill someone if you can produce proof of their consent to it, many snuff films exist in this world because of that policy.

Imagine also that due to advances in genetic technology, there are no longer any STD's/STI's, everyone doesn't age, but only matures into an adult (including you), and everyone is in a state of peak human capability in all areas (this includes you), and where pregnancy only occurs when both partners wish it to happen (rather then the other way around).

What would be the youngest age partner you would have sex with ?
Which family members of yours would you have sex with?
Would you have sex with a corpse?
Would you consume human tissue or fluids?
Which non-humans would you have sex with?

and finally, please identify if you are actually a male or female IRL in your response, it may also be useful to give your IRL age and country, but not required for the purposes of this questionnaire.
8 posts and 2 images omitted.

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 01:34:24 [Preview] No.24142 del
>What would be the youngest age partner you would have sex with ?
If a 5 year old wanted to fuck, then I'd be down for it, assuming she knew what she was doing. Honestly the only limit would be whether I can dick her without causing injury.
>Which family members of yours would you have sex with?
>Would you have sex with a corpse?
>Would you consume human tissue or fluids?
>Which non-humans would you have sex with?

>and finally, please identify if you are actually a male or female IRL in your response
Male, late 20s

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 01:51:11 [Preview] No.24145 del
Observe ye folk that /b/ always was moots favorite ball of shit.
Goog and 4 chum made these babies that now spew forth. Let Whutkins and moot never sleep. This is cancer they ruined a whole generation and on an /intl/ level.

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 23:37:36 [Preview] No.24245 del
Just because most people could do something doesn't mean that they would do it if given the chance.

The laws that exist exist to prevent those few who would do certain things from acting on their deviant (and rare) impulses.

So whatever argument is being made, be it "most would do X if they had the chance, so these laws should not exist", or "nobody would do these things if allowed to do so, so these laws are redundant" will be both asinine and illogical.

FYI, "the ring of Gyges" was a story about a good, virtuous, and honorable farmer named Gyges who found a ring that turned him invisible, this somehow made him become a complete asshole who went around doing whatever he wished, including killing the king and raping the queen.
The point of the story was to show that good people are only good because they are being held accountable for their actions, and that all people are naturally selfish and evil when given the perfect opportunity to behave that way.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 00:23:05 [Preview] No.24248 del
If you had the other person's consent, is any interaction between you and them "victimless"?

If there was no minimum age requirement placed on consent while all other existing rape laws remained in place, then performing sexual acts with a 7 year old who had consented to them, for as long as that consent still stands, would be morally permissible.
Maybe no genital or anal penetration could take place before she objects, but rubbing the penis against the outside of her genitals or anus (the vulva's slit or the buttock's cleft) could be a good substitute for such activities. The child is not physically harmed by such actions and the mental harm (if there is any) would be greatly reduced to the point where it could be ignored.

Sex between family members, such as a younger brother and his older sister, are objected to most frequently on the basis that any children they have would be more likely to inherit the recessive traits within both parents that result in disabilities, illnesses, and deformities.
Now, while the rates are indeed higher than the rates among genetically distant parents, the rates for a child born from one generation of incestuous parents is still going to be low.
It would take multiple successive generations of inbreeding to make being born with these complications a likely event, in most instances where inbreeding among humans resulted in these conditions, it occurred among royal families in cases where incest was mandated, not in a place where incest was permitted, but people were able to freely choose their own partners.
This would not be like the arabs or indians, where marriages are forced upon one of the partners, so having successive generations of incest would not be nearly as common.
But we can also talk about whether or not a greater risk of genetic consequences can actually be used as an argument against any law, are people with disabilities less valuable as people to the point where preventing their existence is considered a good policy? on what basis are we fit to make the judgement? how does this differ from similar laws in the past, such as laws against interracial relations, or laws against allowing the disabled to breed? and where does the line stop? older women are more likely to have children with disabilities, should they be prevented from reproducing by law? and if so, what exactly qualifies as being "genetically unfit"? someone with an IQ below 100 is likely to have a difficult time in the world, IQ is 80-90% determined by genetics, so should they be prevented from breeding as well, even if they don't fit our current definitions of "disabled"?
Other times people bring up abuse, but usually applied to either instances of rape, which are not being argued to be legalized, or in instances where two people consent, but the consent of one of the two is being considered invalid for some reason that could be applied to many situations which remain legal and whose legality has never been argued against.
Incest may even be favorable, as it allows negative recessive traits to be selected against by expressing them as often as dominant ones, when typically these recessive traits would be very resistant to the evolutionary process, if you fuck your older sister and have some children who do not inherit the recessive genes that would have produced the complications associated with incest, it's likely that the child could not possess them at all, and thus would not pass them down to the next generation.
Eventually, the negative recessive traits would be absent of humanity in their entirety, and as a result, incest would not longer have a higher chance of producing negative traits.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 00:23:24 [Preview] No.24249 del
Necrophilia, where the corpses are donated by the deceased for the purpose of sexual usage, and cannibalism/vampirism, where the organs, flesh, bones, blood, and milk is all being donated by the individuals serving as their source, has about the same moral issues as the usage of corpses for any purpose such as medical research, or the same moral issues as sex dolls have. These laws are based solely around disgust, that is baseless when you factor in that any commercial enterprise would take measures in preventing any risk of illness as a result of using their products, every risk (such as kuru) can be greatly reduced in some way (such as thoroughly cooking the human meat before eating it), what's more, some individuals are immune to most risk factors (such as being immune to contracting kuru entirely)

Having sex with non-human brings up the issues of non-human rights, which I would argue against the existence of, our laws should only apply to humans, they should not protect the members of any other species, just as they do not apply to them for purposes of punishment.
The only care I have is that the risk of disease is reduced significantly or negated entirely.

Anonymous 10/13/2019 (Sun) 21:10:38 [Preview] No. 24132 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Is an actual ethnostate possible or just a meme?
4 posts omitted.

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 06:53:02 [Preview] No.24153 del
Most asian countries liek Japan and China mange to live without lots immigrants. Europeans lived without immigrants for hundreds years. So I think yes, it's possible.

Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 12:24:10 [Preview] No.24154 del
Ethnostates are real and already exist right now. Alabama is an example of one, with KKK grandaddies impregnating their grandaughters that give birth to inbred racist retards that come up with lame-ass gee-aren't-I-subtle cocksuckery like "ethnostates."

Anonymous 10/15/2019 (Tue) 09:33:03 [Preview] No.24203 del
>China enacts 1 child policy in 1979
>Economy grows 10% per year
>Meanwhile in the West
>"We need immigrants to grow our economy"

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 18:25:06 [Preview] No.24237 del
China's pool of unemployed people to grow an economy with is more than twice the entire US population. Herp derp.

Don't try to attack US businesses' efforts to lower their costs through paying lower wages to migrant workers by comparing the US to China, attack it by pointing out that they are trying to lower their costs through paying lower wages to migrant workers at the expense of higher unemployment rates among US citizens.

Anonymous 10/17/2019 (Thu) 00:03:18 [Preview] No.24246 del
>they are trying to lower their costs through paying lower wages to migrant workers at the expense of higher unemployment rates among US citizens
I'm afraid that ship has already sailed. Now we are in a race to the bottom. The country which can fuck over its people the hardest will become the wealthiest.

What I find absurd is the idea that the only way we can grow our population is by shipping in people from poor countries. China wasn't always a huge unified country, it made itself into one. If there's one thing Hitler did right, it's creating incentives for women to do what women are supposed to do: raise families.

(173.35 KB 1366x768 art.png)
Polygamy Anonymous 09/25/2019 (Wed) 22:31:30 [Preview] No. 23453 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
What do you guys think about polygamy do you think it should be legal?
4 posts and 1 image omitted.

Anonymous 09/26/2019 (Thu) 20:15:32 [Preview] No.23490 del
should be legal, but moreso because the government shouldn't really have a take on what is or isn't marriage imo as it's just a religious ceremony.

Anonymous 10/03/2019 (Thu) 11:01:17 [Preview] No.23724 del
It's whoring for people who are whores but are in denial of themselves being whores.

Anonymous 10/07/2019 (Mon) 19:32:47 [Preview] No.23910 del
We all agree that multiple wives is okay or even healthy, but multiple husbands is evil from the depths of hell?

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 18:55:00 [Preview] No.24238 del

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 22:49:08 [Preview] No.24244 del
Obviously. A man is a leader a women is to follow her man.

the first hurdle of talking to normalfags Anonymous 10/14/2019 (Mon) 17:40:25 [Preview] No. 24166 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Okay, so I live in a city, winnipeg, manitoba, canada, it's not the largest city in my country, but it's large enough that there are a lot of non-whites from around thew world living here, blacks, arabs, hispanics, you name it.

Now, I typically have not had many negative experiences with them, they and I can have a pleasant conversation, they are typically polite, friendly, and basically behave like white people.

Some even go beyond the normal, such as the notable case when four teenaged arab muslim girls bought me a cab ride home, when a black kid told me when I almost left my phone behind on the bus, and there were other things like that which occurred every now and then.

Every time I talk to someone about politics, they bring up all the positive experiences they've personally had with non-whites, most recently, a 60-year old man lecturing me on how well he got along with the team of indian immigrants we was working with, or some chick talking about how well she was treated by a nigerian CFS worker as child.

Now, I base my political positions on statistics and how well policies have worked in the past, so my positions regarding non-whites are not going to change due to these stories, but for the average person, their daily experiences with non-whites are mostly positive and give them the impression that "we are all the same" despite any racial, ethnic, or national differences, and this has had a real significant effect on how they think regarding racial issues.

I remember talking about jews, and a woman bringing up a photograph of her jewish friend, as if it negated everything I said.

So, I'm thinking about how we can best work with this to benefit our cause and our people, looking at how we typically talk about non-whites, such as when watching an episode of "murdoch murdoch", I see the way we depict all non-whites as being (from a normie perspective, mind you) completely disconnected from reality, to show blacks as ALWAYS being some stupid, ugly, and violent creature is something that clashes with the average white's experience of black people, as pretty much every black they meet is going to not resemble this caricature of them at all.

It makes us look delusional, and greatly undermines our ability to be related to by the masses we seek to reach.
If we make arguments to the masses, we need to get across to them that we live in the same reality that they do, we need to acknowledge the experiences they have with non-whites, and why these experiences do not invalidate anything we say.
11 posts and 4 images omitted.

Anonymous 10/15/2019 (Tue) 05:24:31 [Preview] No.24190 del
/pol/ won't like it because you are trying to form a working relationship with other races against jews. Others won't like it because it's /pol/. Only argument I can see from a retarded /pol/spective is that there needs to be a nuance dialog on race because /pol/'s doesn't fit with reality and racial intermixing and immigration means you can't just be 100% against every group. Which /pol/ will hate because they spend hours upon hours of everyday having that view that all other races are inferior and it's all a jewish plot. Any compromise is just going to hurt your ingroup in there eyes and they will never accept that these people of whom you have had positive experiences with are human too. You could do too things 1) tone it down a little and try to reach some people by the simple logic that you do need to recognize at least some nuance to the situation because /pol/ won't just get a clean race war like the want do to different dynamics of assimilation and regional loyalties. But they are just as likely to say, "LULZ, your a leaf and your country is already fucked!" Or 2) try to set up a some kind of new political group that maintains skepticism to the jews but isn't fully Nat-Soc or White Nationalist, which would also be hard to do and you'd have to tone down your /pol/ belifes, which will alienate /pol/lacks and won't get your very many non-pollacks. You'd have to find some kind of other ground to stand on, which I'll admit isn't impossible , but be very hard. You need to come up with some other glue to hold them togather and I haven't seen this done on a larger scale on a smaller scale, Texas nationalist and localist are actually starting to arise from the hispanic population do to the an increasing adoption of a Texan identity and customs in rural areas where they moved too, yet they are still far from a relevant force. being a /pol/centrist or /pol/jw probably won't work on its own.

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 18:09:07 [Preview] No.24236 del
(20.65 KB 400x363 0ae.jpg)
OP, I absolutely fucked my posts up for no good reason, maybe I was a bit lazy, maybe my mid-range IQ was showing. What I'm saying to you is, do not buy on this half-truths people are selling to you:
<whites are superior and want to genocide
>southern whites in amerikkka

The whole LARP about whites being superior is just people forcing their views on you. It is funny when people say that being racist is just being white and thinking people are inferior based on color. Those are not real racists, those are just bigots and they are not being different from blacks, you can say wiggers. Race realism is just knowing that we aren't equal in racial terms, and that equality can't provide results in non-homogeneous societies, it is just in-fighting and who is the victim of the hour. Racism is accepting the whole spectrum of race and stop believing in fairy-tales of post-scarcity trans-human-communist societies these soon to be post-op trannies want you to. These people are mentally ill, but (((society))) have found a way to integrate and profit from them, even if it means a circus show and mass shootings every 3 days or so.

This would be what we talk about when we say inferior. All these half-breeds know to do is to be negative about anything related to race, they do vibrate in a whole different range. There is plenty of research and IRL evidence to confirm these known differences. It is forcing us to shape our behavior and tolerate others in a economic relationship to accommodate the corpse of democracy. Until we face race as something meaningful in demographics, we are doomed to repeat this cycle of aggression.

Also there is this effort in downplaying every facet of anything that can be meaningful to whites. Since Frankfurt school, there is this trend of transforming National Socialism, being European and Christian into a pathology, but this have gone such a long way it became common sense, as if it was a good thing. Now see, etymology:
commom; Middle English: from Old French comun (adjective), from Latin communis.
sense; ate Middle English (as a noun in the sense ‘meaning’): from Latin sensus ‘faculty of feeling, thought, meaning’, from sentire ‘feel’. The verb dates from the mid 16th century.
People who use common sense think they are part of some political zeitgeist, but they are just using their feelings to think things over and surrendering to herd mentality. Again, Hitler didn't want to slave or genocide other races, he just wanted a world where Germany would be for ethnically-German people without kike-financial meddling trying to debase them into debt prostitution. Do you think he wanted Germans to invade South America or Africa? He had no interest in those places, beside giving them the opportunity to drink from National Socialism ideology and fortify their ties with their own race. But those days are long gone, all that remains is violence against whites and the big ol' victim-aggressor mentality of culturally-infested-kike nations. All they know to do is fester hate while promoting their equality bullshit under the guise of democracy. It is incredible isn't it? They have been expelled from places for 2 thousand years(goes back to Egipt) and still manage to surface as a victim every single time, I mean there must be something wrong about this guys, but try to surface that and their psychological spell starts to kick-in and once you know it is anudah shoa all over again and you're on the News.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 19:30:08 [Preview] No.24239 del
> they will never accept that these people of whom you have had positive experiences with are human too.
A total lie.
Pol means politically incorrect, and the left is obviously trying to be as correct as they can be. Where are you coming from carrotgirl?

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 19:32:07 [Preview] No.24240 del
You could never get a nation with money that has all founding fathers of some race other than white. USA was the first to cast down these eurosnot kinglets and be bold, and all use George Washiongton's paper.

Anonymous 10/16/2019 (Wed) 19:35:02 [Preview] No.24241 del
(21.18 KB 336x348 8a30b6e366.jpg)
The US civil war was a jewish trick.